Near as I remember " Reflections of a Civil War Veteran

Near as I remember " Reflections of a Civil War Veteran I offer an array of first person presentations that illustrate the daily life and experiences of the typical Civil War infantry soldier.

The future is here.
09/29/2022

The future is here.

Melting ice is one of the key threats of climate change. This year, low snowfall and persistent heat waves caused a 6% loss of glaciers in the Alps, according to a new Swiss study.

08/21/2021

Right now I’m taking reservations for talks I will give during Fall - Winter 2021-22. To learn more, visit www.nearasiremember.com.

I offer an array of first person presentations that illustrate the daily life and experiences of the typical Civil War infantry soldier.

The only thing many people know of the American Civil War is a handful of generals’ names and the hazy recollection of a...
07/25/2021

The only thing many people know of the American Civil War is a handful of generals’ names and the hazy recollection of a few battles. The war was a complex event that determined the future course of our nation’s history, and we ought to know more about it.

My name is Rob Stone. Being a Civil War re-enactor for 25 years has given me extensive knowledge and experience regarding the ordinary soldier’s daily life during that conflict.

Via my lecture service, “Near as I Remember,” I offer hour-long talks on a variety of topics relating to Civil War army life, whether it’s the soldier’s clothing, his diet, or the songs he sang.

What sets “Near as I Remember” apart from other historical presentations is that mine are done first-person, in the guise of an aging veteran who’s speaking in 1896. My practice of remaining in first-person throughout my lectures delights and fascinates audiences.

Why not schedule one or more of my talks for your social group, Civil War roundtable, or a dinner party or family gathering! Delivered with enthusiasm and a dash of humor, they easily adapt to different settings.

To learn about my affordable lectures - performed in-person or via Zoom - and to read what patrons have said about them, please visit nearasiremember.com. You’ll be glad you did!

"Rob Stone's presentation delighted my Advanced Placement U.S. History students. His thoughtful and engaging first-person talk was not only accurate, but made the students think critically and ask in-depth questions."

The only thing many people know of the American Civil War is a handful of generals’ names and the hazy recollection of a...
07/25/2021

The only thing many people know of the American Civil War is a handful of generals’ names and the hazy recollection of a few battles. The war was a complex event that determined the future course of our nation’s history, and we ought to know more about it.

My name is Rob Stone. Being a Civil War re-enactor for 25 years has given me extensive knowledge and experience regarding the ordinary soldier’s daily life during that conflict.

Via my lecture service, “Near as I Remember,” I offer hour-long talks on a variety of topics relating to Civil War army life, whether it’s the soldier’s clothing, his diet, or the songs he sang.

What sets “Near as I Remember” apart from other historical presentations is that mine are done first-person, in the guise of an aging veteran who’s speaking in 1896. My practice of remaining in first-person throughout my lectures delights and fascinates audiences.

Why not schedule one or more of my talks for your social group, Civil War roundtable, or even a dinner party or family gathering! Delivered with enthusiasm and a dash of humor, they easily adapt to different settings.

To learn about my affordable lectures - performed in-person or via Zoom - and to read what patrons have said about them, please visit nearasiremember.com. You’ll be glad you did!

"Rob Stone's presentation delighted my Advanced Placement U.S. History students. His thoughtful and engaging first-person talk was not only accurate, but made the students think critically and ask in-depth questions."

07/13/2020

Friends, as the status of the novel coronavirus waxes and wanes, I have decided to suspend my in-person talks for the balance of calendar 2020.

However, I am working on being able to offer the talks via - you guessed it - Zoom.

Please stay tuned!

03/04/2020

[The interview went swimmingly, and I enjoyed the experience immensely. Be sure to view it, and invite friends to do so. I need the business!]

This afternoon I will be interviewed about Near as I Remember on JTV’s (Jackson, Michigan cable ) “The Bart Hawley Show.”

JTV is available on Comcast Ch. 90, AT&T U-Verse Ch. 5380, WOW! Cable Ch. 161, on ROKU and Amazon Fire TV. JTV also streams live 24/7 at www.jtv.tv.

If you’re in the neighborhood, please consider attending my upcoming talk!
03/02/2020

If you’re in the neighborhood, please consider attending my upcoming talk!

12/04/2019

GIVING TUESDAY INVITATION

I invite you to consider scheduling one (or more!) of my hour long, first person lectures on aspects of the Civil War soldier’s everyday life.

These aren’t collections of names and dates, like you might have been subjected to in high school history class! My talks combine 25+ years’ worth of re-enacting with my deep knowledge of the Civil War.

Visit www.nearasirenember.com for descriptions of my presentations, and to sign up an appearance before your group’s holiday gathering or seasonal party.

12/04/2019

A “GIVING TUESDAY” INVITATION

I’m not asking for contributions; all I want is to encourage FB folks to consider reserving one (or more) of my first-person talks regarding the daily life of the typical Civil War soldier.

Please consider having me present at your holiday party, family gathering and the like. My fee is very reasonable, and I guarantee a unique experience!

11/03/2019

Soldier’s wages during the Civil War – Part 1

Introduction

Many people are familiar with how the Civil War’s outbreak in April 1861 sparked a previously unheard of demand for things like fi****ms, clothing and all manner of equipment. But it is easy to overlook the massive infusions of cash required by the Union and Confederate governments to maintain the “sinews of war.” This is the first part of an article regarding how the challenge of paying the troops in particular evolved.

More than you want to know about American money prior to the Civil War
While gold and silver coinage (“specie”) were the economic benchmarks in the British colonies, and afterward in the newly independent United States, there was never enough hard cash to go around. Relatively few coins were minted in the Thirteen Colonies, so foreign coins like the Spanish dollar were used to take up the slack.

Even though paper money (“currency”) was suspect in many peoples’ eyes, its metallic cousin’s scarcity and burgeoning economic requirements necessitated having it. At times colonial governments printed currency to undergird large undertakings: from 1751 to 1773 the British Parliament passed a trio of Currency Acts that regulated paper money in the colonies. To finance the Revolutionary War, individual colonies and the Continental Congress alike produced a bumper crop of currencies. Problem was, both varieties of “folding money” quickly depreciated, to the point that they were practically worthless by war’s end.

Two Banks of the United States (1791-1811; 1816-1836) functioned as agents of the U.S. Treasury. As unpopular as the idea of a centralized national bank was to many Americans, these institutions served to ensure that the plethora of state, or private banks in existence redeemed the banknotes they printed at full value. The props were knocked from under this arrangement when President Andrew Jackson, hostile to the idea of a national bank, failed to renew the second Bank of the United States’ charter in 1836.

The banking system goes to war

The banking free fall that resulted from this action lasted until the midpoint of the Civil War. Early on the Lincoln Administration sought to finance its war effort via loans taken out from major banks. The ruinous interest rates they charged forced Honest Abe to seek a different solution.

Thus, in July 1861, Congress authorized printing of $50M in Demand Notes. These bore no interest but could be redeemed for specie “on demand.” Printed on both sides—unlike state and private banknotes—the practice of using green ink on the reverse led to Demand Notes being nicknamed “greenbacks.” Initially they were discounted relative to gold but soon the government suspended this form of redemption. When the treasury authorized paying interest on Demand Notes, their value stabilized. From March 1862 to mid-1863 they were declared legal tender, but only to pay customs duties.

In the final analysis, Demand Notes turned out to be just another inadequate means of paying for the increasingly costly conflict. Early in 1862 the idea was floated of issuing paper money whose value wasn’t backed by precious metals. In February of that year, Congress passed the first Legal Tender Act. But it wasn’t until passage of the National Bank Act of 1863 that the United States financial system was finally stabilized.

The act stipulated the circulation of a uniform national currency, secured by federal bonds. It also clarified many issues that strengthened the system. Under the 1863 act state banks could continue to issue their own currency, but when Congress levied a 10 percent tax on them, they disappeared rapidly.

“Away down South in Dixie”

I was surprised to learn that the Confederate States had issued its dollar prior to the bombardment of Fort Sumter. This currency was backed by a promise to pay the bearer after the C.S.A.’s victory, rather than by hard assets, something that is illustrative of the fragility of the South’s finances, from the get-go.

The initial issuance of Confederate paper money, in March of 1861, was a relatively modest event. It bore interest and had a total circulation of just $1M. As Confederate fortunes on the battlefield began to decline, so confidence in the currency diminished. As a result the government inflated the currency by printing more and more unbacked banknotes. By the end of 1863, the Confederate "grayback" (as opposed to the Yankee “greenback”) was worth just six cents in gold.

At first, Confederate currency was accepted throughout the South as a medium of exchange with genuine purchasing power. As the Confederacy faltered, however, the redemption dates of all that paper money were extended ever further into the future. Inflation became rampant. For example, news of the Army of Northern Virginia’s defeat at Gettysburg caused Confederate currency to depreciate by 20 percent, virtually overnight.

Stay tuned for Part 2 of this exploration of the role that money played in fighting the American Civil War!

10/05/2019

Repeaters: Successors to the Rifle Musket – Part 2

Part 1 of this article observed that, by the mid-Nineteenth Century, many efforts were being devoted to the creation of repeating fi****ms meant to supersede the rifle musket. Here I will review a trio of weapons that, in my opinion, were milestones in this endeavor: C**t’s New Model Revolving Rifle, the Spencer Repeating Rifle, and the Henry Rifle.

C**t’s New Model Revolving Rifle
In 1836 Samuel C**t patented the five-shot C**t Paterson revolver, the first commercial repeating firearm employing a revolving cylinder with multiple chambers aligned with a stationary barrel. Because C**t lacked the facilities to manufacture pistols, he collaborated with the armory run by the family of Eli Whitney Jr., the son of the cotton-gin developer and pioneer in manufacturing with interchangeable parts. By the time the Civil War broke out, Samuel C**t was producing revolvers for personal, law enforcement and military use.

Even as the C**t’s Patent Fire Arms Manufacturing Company’s handgun designs evolved, the firm sought ways to broaden its market. In 1855 the company had a revolving rifle that became the first of its type to be adopted by the United States military. However, a series of problems kept it from being issued until 1857. The Model 1855 was available in several calibers, .36 and .44 (six-shot cylinder) and .56 (five shot). In addition, the rifle could be ordered with barrels of 15, 18, 21 or 24 inches. So many variants must have made inventory management a headache.

Paper cartridges (ignited by percussion caps) were the revolving rifle’s Achilles Heel. Gunpowder leaking from improperly sealed cartridges could lodge in recesses around the cylinder. Hot gas leaking from the gap between the firing cylinder and barrel touched off this loose powder, with the result that all cartridges in the cylinder were set off, simultaneously. This phenomenon, known as “chain fire,” endangered the rifle’s firer, whose face and hands were in close proximity to the cylinder. To counter this shortcoming, soldiers were instructed to thoroughly clean their C**ts, or load and fire one round at a time. The latter cut the ground from under the C**t’s design as a repeater!

Despite this flaw the U.S. government purchased over 4,500 C**t New Model Revolving Rifles during the war. There was at least one instance where the C**t showed its combat potential: during the Battle of Chickamauga (September 10-18, 1863) the volume of fire put out by the 21st Ohio Volunteer Infantry convinced the Confederates opposing them that they were up against an entire division of Union troops. Despite such isolated bright spots, the military decided to discontinue use of the Model 1855.

Spencer Repeating Rifle
The design for Christopher Spencer’s repeating rifles and carbines was finalized in 1860. A lever action, magazine fed weapon, the Spencer was the world’s first metallic cartridge military repeater. Its ammunition was .56-56 caliber, copper rimfire cartridges, a technological advance that cured the C**t’s chain fire malady. A great success, between 1860 and 1869 over 200,000 examples were manufactured. The Union Army was the Spencer’s primary adopter, with the cavalry favoring the shorter, carbine model.

A lever on the Spencer extracted an expended case from the breech, after which a fresh cartridge was fed into it from a seven-round magazine located in the buttstock. The hammer had to be manually cocked each time, before the weapon was fired. Once the magazine was emptied it had to be removed and refilled before firing could resume. Ammunition replenishment was achieved by putting individual rounds into the magazine tube, or by using a device called the Blakeslee Cartridge Box. The Blakeslee Box was a wood-and-leather container with a shoulder strap. It held six, ten or thirteen preloaded tin tubes, each of which contained seven rounds. These tubes’ contents could be poured into the Spencer’s buttstock, enabling a rapid return to action.

The rapid-firing repeaters gave military authorities pause. They worried that soldiers would quickly expend all their ammunition, making resupply a logistical nightmare. This concern didn’t fade with the passage of time: I understand the same objections arose when the first M-16 rifles, capable of being fired in full-automatic mode, were used during the Vietnam War. To allay what came to be called “spray and pray,” the M-16’s firing selector was subsequently modified to feature three-round burst fire option.

The Spencer was initially adopted by the United States Navy, then the Army followed suit. This repeater experienced its baptism of fire in the Gettysburg Campaign of 1863, in the hands of the 13th Pennsylvania Reserves. The Spencer proved to be a very reliable battlefield weapon. Capable of sustained fire of 20 rounds per minute, its jacketed ammunition was resistant to moisture and rough handling. Sometimes Spencer’s were captured by Confederate troops but the inability of their government to manufacture ammunition for them limited their usefulness. When the Spencer was declared surplus it was sold to France, where it was utilized in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870.

The Henry Rifle
I believe the Henry Rifle’s appearance represented a watershed in American military rifle design. Like the Spencer Repeater, the Henry was a lever action, breech loading, magazine fed gun with metallic cartridges. The features that set Benjamin Tyler Henry’s design apart from its forerunners were a tube magazine mounted under the barrel, and the fact that, jacking the lever not only ejected the spent cartridge, but also cocked the hammer when the fresh round entered the chamber. The magazine was loaded from the front and was capable of housing an astonishing fifteen .44 caliber rimfire bullets, plus one in the chamber.

A slow rate of production (150 – 200 per month until 1864), combined with a high price ($40 and up) severely limited the Henry’s battlefield use. Indeed, only about 14,000 examples had been manufactured by the time production ended in 1866. The Federal government purchased fewer than 1,800 Henry’s during the Civil War, but as many as 7,000 of them were bought by individual soldiers, with their own money. Spending more than forty dollars on a weapon, when a private earned just $13 per month showed the confidence engendered by this new firearm. Indeed, it is reported that many soldiers who reenlisted in 1864 used the bounty associated with this commitment to avail themselves of a Henry Rifle of their own.

As was the case with the Spencer, the Henry’s high rate of fire made standard infantry tactics of the day obsolete. It was issued primarily to raiding parties, skirmishers, and scouts. The few Rebels fortunate enough to find themselves in possession of a Henry Rifle were once again hobbled by the Confederate armory’s inability to manufacture its ammunition. When famed Confederate cavalry commander Colonel John Mosby encountered the Henry for the first time, he is reputed to have referred to it as “that damned Yankee rifle that can be loaded on Sunday and fired all week.” This description stuck with it ever afterward.

The Henry Rifle appeared in a handful of Civil War actions, including the Battle of Franklin in 1864 but it really came into its own during the Plains Wars: many of the Cheyenne and Sioux warriors that defeated General George A. Custer’s 7th Cavalry troops at the 1876 Battle of Little Big Horn were armed with Henry repeaters.

Unlike the C**t and Spencer repeating rifles, the Henry design lived on after the Civil War. It evolved first into the renowned Wi******er Model 1866, whose side gate loading mechanism overcame the challenge of having to load a tube magazine. The Wi******er Model 1873 became the most famous lever action Wi******er, being called “The Gun that Won the West.”

In Conclusion
The weapons covered in this article represent just the tip of the repeating firearm iceberg. Each had its plusses and minuses. Fielded in the midst of a turbulent era in American history, they were the products of men whose desire was to sell a cutting edge weapon to the government, and to—forgive the allusion—make a killing. I hope you have found my exploration of this topic to be of interest. Please invite your friends to visit and follow this page. Thank you!

09/09/2019

Repeaters: Successors to the Rifle Musket – Part 1

Readers of my article on the rifle musket and the role it played in the American Civil War may recall that weapon’s short-lived prominence in the annals of military history. Even in the rifle musket’s heyday an astonishing number of inventors and tinkerers—including Union general Ambrose E. Burnside—were already hard at work, designing long fi****ms intended to address a couple of its key shortcomings: it was cumbersome to load, and had a slow rate of fire.

Here’s what I believe to be a good definition of “repeating rifle,” from Richard C. Rattenbury: “A repeating rifle is a rifled shoulder arm typically designed with a spring-loaded tubular or box magazine holding metallic cartridges, each of which is fed into the chamber or breech by a lever, pump, bolt, or semiautomatic mechanism.”

Got it?

Repeaters existed as far back as the Seventeenth Century. In 1680 Florentine gunmaker Michele Lorenzoni devised a magazine-fed repeater system that appeared on weapons manufactured in Europe and the United States, as late as 1849. Of course, the early generation of repeaters did not fire metallic cartridges; this advance came around the time of the Civil War.

Briton John Cookson’s flintlock rifle, a lever-action breech-loading repeater, was a design that featured the “Lorenzoni System.” The Cookson, dating from 1690, features a dual-chamber, horizontally mounted rotating drum. Lowering a lever on the left side causes the drum to line up with a pair of magazines in the butt, containing seven .55 cal. balls and as many 60-grain powder charges.

Returning the lever causes one ball and a charge to drop into the firing chamber. This action also cocked the hammer, primed the pan and lowered the frizzen (This "L"-shaped piece of steel hinged at the front protected the powder in the pan. When the trigger is pulled, the frizzen scrapes the flint to produce sparks that ignited the powder.) While robust, Cookson’s design permitted flame to leak from the chamber into the powder magazine, with the result that the gun exploded!

The identity of the Kalthoff flintlock rifle’s inventor is unknown; its name comes from the German gunsmiths who were associated with the design. Like the Cookson rifle, the Kalthoff featured a magazine each for powder and six balls. Instead of a side lever, the forward-and-back motion of its trigger guard deposited the ball and charge in the breech and cocked the piece.

A small carrier transported powder from its magazine to the breech, eliminating the risk of accidental ignition. While the Kalthoff mechanism improved on that of Cookson, its delicacy, expense and difficulty to maintain made it impractical for military use.

Part 2 of this article will explore the blossoming of repeater technology, in the mid-Nineteenth Century.

Address

Ann Arbor, MI
48108

Telephone

+17346451069

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Near as I remember " Reflections of a Civil War Veteran posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Near as I remember " Reflections of a Civil War Veteran:

Share