Advocacy Skill Development Program Pakistan

Advocacy Skill Development Program Pakistan Naved Ahmad Advocate having vast experience to develop Advocacy Training. Anyone is interested for Advocacy Development can contact at any time.

06/03/2015

Witness Handling

(a) Examination in Chief

1. First think of the answer that you want to obtain, and then work out the question or questions that are necessary to obtain the desired answer.

2. Second, and where appropriate build your question on the preceding answer. This will help.

3. Keep questions short and simple, especially if the witness is not cooperative or is reluctant.

4. Beware of repeating a question to which you have not received the answer, which you require.

5. Avoid “leading questions”. A leading question is one, which suggests the answer or which contains an assumption as to the answer i.e. do not put an answer in the mouth of the witness.

6. Don’t ask questions like “What happened next?” This leads you to lose control of the story you want to get from the witness.

7. Use open but focused questions. A good tip is to start questions with words such as “Who”, “What”, “When”, “Where”, “Why” and “How”. You may also use “Describe”, “Explain”, “Tell”.

8. Set the scene, put characters in the scene and then roll out the action.

9. Use language which the client understands

10. Establish facts not your client’s conclusions or opinions.


(b) Cross examination

1. Understand the reasons for cross-examining. There are only two reasons to cross examine any witness:
• Undermining the reliability of evidence damaging the cross examiner’s client’s case, and

• Supporting the cross examiner’s client’s case by bringing out evidence which is favourable to it.

2. Keep questions short and simple, especially if the witness is antagonistic.

3. Beware of repeating a question to which you have not received the answer that you require. It gives the impression of weakness in your case.

4. Ask those questions first to which you expect to receive favourable answers

5. Ask only leading questions. Use closed questions. You may use words such as “Did” “Was” “Were” to begin your questions.

6. Don’t twist the evidence, or score cheap points but do emphasize relevant discrepancies.

7. Beware of asking one question too many which may undo the advantage that you have already scored.

8. Never ask a question in cross-examination to which you do not know the answer.

9. Keep cool even with an antagonistic or irritating witness. Do not become angry with the witness as this may also irritate the Court.

10. Do not argue with the witness.

11. Do not interrupt your witness.

12. As with an Examination in Chief think of the answer, which you want to obtain, then work out the questions, which are necessary to obtain that answer.

13. Ask short and direct questions. Aiming to get one point only.

14. Restrict questions to necessary areas.

15. Avoid “are you sure?” questions. Avoid statements like “I put to you..” or “I suggest….”

23/01/2015

Witness Handling

(a) Examination in Chief

1. First think of the answer that you want to obtain, and then work out the question or questions that are necessary to obtain the desired answer.

2. Second, and where appropriate build your question on the preceding answer. This will help.

3. Keep questions short and simple, especially if the witness is not cooperative or is reluctant.

4. Beware of repeating a question to which you have not received the answer, which you require.

5. Avoid “leading questions”. A leading question is one, which suggests the answer or which contains an assumption as to the answer i.e. do not put an answer in the mouth of the witness.

6. Don’t ask questions like “What happened next?” This leads you to lose control of the story you want to get from the witness.

7. Use open but focused questions. A good tip is to start questions with words such as “Who”, “What”, “When”, “Where”, “Why” and “How”. You may also use “Describe”, “Explain”, “Tell”.

8. Set the scene, put characters in the scene and then roll out the action.

9. Use language which the client understands

10. Establish facts not your client’s conclusions or opinions.

12/01/2015

Case Preparation:

Effective preparation must be directed towards:

1. The identification of the real issue or issues in the case
This involves identifying the main issue as well as any secondary issue that arises.

2. Identifying the relevant facts
At this stage we are interested in facts only and not inferences or conclusions that may be drawn from those facts

3. Evaluating the facts in light of the issues
Which of the facts are helpful in supporting your case?
Which are unhelpful?
Are the good facts wholly goods or can the other side use them too?
Are the bad facts entirely bad?

What are the most important facts available in support of your aims?
Select only what you need
Put these facts in order in the order of importance
Are there facts that need to be established before certain inferences can be drawn?
Are any of the facts inadmissible in evidence?

4. Formulate a case theory: A perfect theory of the case is one which
Conforms with the law
Requires no credible witness to be disbelieved
Comports with common sense
Is fair

5. Structuring the case
From what source can you get the relevant and most important facts into evidence?
Do you have choices? (e.g. from one or more witnesses, from a witness of the other side, or from a document)
Which is the most persuasive source, which is the least dangerous, which the most reliable?
How can you avoid calling a vulnerable witness by making another witness give the same evidence?
What questions do you need to ask in order to establish the facts necessary for your case?
In what sequence would you ask these questions in order to both assist the witness and to make the point most effectively?
Are there any documents, which will focus the witness and will assist him or her in making a more accurate deposition?
In what sequence will you call the witnesses?
How do you wish each witness to be viewed by the judges i.e. honest and reliable, honest but muddled, biased or neutral, wholly dishonest or only in relation to certain aspects?

12/12/2014

Case Preparation
a. Case Analysis (whether Criminal or Civil)
b. Determination of Facts of a Case
i. Good Facts of your case.
ii. Bad Facts of your case.
c. Evaluating of your facts even good or bad.

07/12/2014

Preparation of facts is the main important point for good advocacy.

Address

Suite 139 Sunny Plaza Hasrat Mohani Road
Karachi
74200

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Advocacy Skill Development Program Pakistan posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Advocacy Skill Development Program Pakistan:

Shortcuts

Share