09/11/2021
Here's a short post with no picture, unfortunately. It is, rather, a description of the research process when people are truly unknown.
I received an email from a young woman who is a fairly high match to me on both Ancestry and Family Tree DNA a bit more than a year ago. She is in the range at which the match MUST be true; there are too many cM of shared DNA for it to be a "false positive". In fact, it turns out that we are second cousins twice removed. We share ancestors William James Bullington and Sarah Ann Boone Bullington. They are my great-grandparents, her 3rd greats.
She was given up for adoption and her records are sealed, so she decided to use DNA to find her birth parents. She is very grateful for the life that her adoptive parents gave her, and has a strong relationship with her adoptive mother still. Unfortunately, her adoptive father passed away a few years ago.
But still, she was curious about her genetic roots.
She had tried an "Adoption Angel", folks who offer to help adoptees find their birth parents, and for some reason chose to contact me as well. I am among her highest matches, but not the highest at all. So she may have contacted others with no result. Or maybe it was just fate that led her to someone who is very active building out the extended family tree.
Anyway, she had an uncle level match which turned out to be to a maternal uncle, so it was pretty easy to find her mother, who still lives near the town in which my friend was born. But both the Adoption Angel and I ran smack into a brick wall with her birth father. She downloaded her "top 50" list of adoptions and sent it to me, and I did "matches in common" search on both Ancestry and Family Tree.
After a bit of work by me "rolling" descendants of my Bullington great-grandparents forward to identify the living people who matched us both, I concluded that the best possibility was that we did indeed share William James and Sarah as most recent common ancestors.
She was able to contact her birth mother who didn't remember much about that time, but insisted that the father was a "James Tyler" over and over. I worked hard to find a Tyler branch by marriage from William James and Sarah, but to no avail.
Brick wall.
Then, about ten days ago I got a huge surprise when a new top level match for me popped, my third highest. She has two tiny trees on Ancestry, but one showed me her maiden name and the other her married name.
With some work on Whitepages I was able to identify the woman and trace her lineage and it went right back to William James and Sarah. When I saw that her birth name was "Taylor" and that she lived in the town in which my friend was born, I was really excited.
"Taylor" could certainly be remembered as "Tyler".
I emailed her and asked "How high is your match with [my new match]?" She quickly replied, "The cm's are SO HIGH. She must be my Aunt!" And indeed she is her Aunt, with 1900 cM shared, smack in the middle of the range for aunts, uncles, nieces and nephews.
That brick wall was broken down because of the good fortune that my new cousin decided to take a DNA test. Perhaps she was only interested in her ethnic background, because she was surprised when I contacted her. She had not looked at her match list in the two days since it was completed.
But what a very nice end of the search for my cousin.