Cornish Riviera Holidays

Cornish Riviera Holidays Est in 1984, we are a family run, St Ives based agency that are local, friendly and trusted.

We manage a fine selection of over 70 fisherman's cottages and harbour-side flats all in the heart of St.Ives with its sandy beaches, picturesque harbour and town full of quaint cottages and cobbled courtyards, restaurants, shops and galleries. The beautiful St.Ives bay benefits from a mild climate and can be enjoyed all year round.

Fogous, West Cornwall’s Greatest MysteryA fogou is one of the most mysterious forms of ancient monument found in Cornwal...
05/09/2026

Fogous, West Cornwall’s Greatest Mystery

A fogou is one of the most mysterious forms of ancient monument found in Cornwall. The word comes from the Cornish ogo, meaning ‘cave’, and is used to describe carefully constructed underground passages and chambers built from stone.Fogous are found predominantly in the far west of Cornwall, mainly in Penwith and the area around the upper Helford, with examples further afield, including one in mid-Cornwall and one on St Mary’s in the Isles of Scilly. They are associated with settlements dating from the Iron Age onwards.

Their exact purpose remains uncertain. Archaeologists have suggested that they may have been used for storage, food preservation, shelter or refuge, or may have had ritual or ceremonial functions. None of these interpretations can be proven. It is quite possible that their uses varied from settlement to settlement, and that a structure originally built for one purpose was later used for another.Unlike a church, house or mine, a fogou does not announce its function clearly. Its very secrecy is part of what makes these structures so fascinating.

The temptation to interpret fogous as defensive structures is understandable. They are concealed, underground spaces, often incorporated into settlements or their boundaries, and some contain narrow passages and restricted entrances. In societies without permanent state institutions such as police, protecting livestock and wealth would presumably have been an important concern. If communities were exposed to occasional raiding or theft, a concealed underground chamber could potentially have provided a place of refuge or a secure location for valuables.

However, there is a big difference between saying that a fogou could have provided refuge and claiming that it was specifically built as a military structure or ‘war shelter’. The evidence simply does not allow us to make that conclusion with confidence. Their architecture is too varied, and there is no single feature that proves a defensive purpose. A fogou may have provided security, but security does not necessarily imply warfare. Concealing food, tools, valuables or other possessions, or providing a temporary refuge during periods of danger, are all possibilities that do not require organised military conflict.

The argument for defensive use becomes particularly interesting when the wider archaeological evidence from Penwith and the surrounding areas is considered. There is very little evidence for sustained inter-community warfare. Sling stones were found at Chun Castle, for example, but by themselves they cannot demonstrate that a battle or attack took place there. West Cornwall has no known large Iron Age battlefield, and no mass graves of combatants have ever been found. Neither has anyone found evidence of destruction layers, concentrations of weapons or clearly identifiable attack damage demonstrating that a settlement was destroyed by a hostile force.

The absence of such evidence does not prove that warfare never occurred. Archaeology rarely allows such absolute conclusions. It is reasonable to suggest that the local population may have engaged in livestock raids and may have had the occasional boundary dispute with their neighbours. However, my understanding is that Penwith did not support the sort of population numbers that would have made large-scale warfare particularly practical.

The concentration of fogous in Penwith may also tell us something about the connections between the communities that built them. Rather than representing completely separate and competing groups, they may have shared cultural traditions and ideas about how settlements and underground spaces should be constructed and used. If that is the case, it becomes harder to argue that Iron Age West Cornwall was so accustomed to large-scale conflict between organised tribal groups that complex defensive structures were routinely required.

That, however, is my own interpretation rather than something that can be demonstrated archaeologically.

If conflict did occur, it may have taken other forms, and this is where the distinction between warfare and raiding is important. A livestock raid or small-scale attack could leave very little permanent archaeological evidence. A group could arrive, seize animals or goods, threaten or injure inhabitants and leave without causing deaths or destroying a settlement. Even a violent confrontation might leave little behind, perhaps, if we are lucky, a broken weapon, a damaged object or, in the rarest and most extreme case, an identifiable battlefield death. Raiding therefore provides a plausible context in which to consider some of the security characteristics associated with fogous.

Livestock was an important form of wealth, while the scattered nature of settlements in Penwith and the demands of agricultural production would have made animals a valuable resource vulnerable to theft. In such a society, secure storage, concealed spaces and settlement boundaries could have been valuable even in the absence of sustained warfare.

The physical construction of fogous is also significant. These were highly engineered underground structures, generally constructed from drystone walls roofed with large slabs of local stone. Some are narrow passages, while others develop into much larger chambers. Several contain side passages, commonly described as ‘creeps’, which can be extremely confined. The labour and planning required to construct them suggest that they had an important role within the communities that built them. They were certainly not incidental features of ordinary domestic architecture.

Their regional distribution is equally important. Fogous are found predominantly in Penwith and around the upper Helford. Their concentration suggests that they formed part of a distinctive regional architectural tradition. This does not necessarily mean that all fogous had the same function, but it does suggest that communities in western Cornwall shared ideas about the construction and use of such spaces.

Carn Euny provides perhaps the clearest example of the complexity of fogous. Its settlement developed from the Iron Age, and its unusually elaborate underground complex contains an earlier circular chamber with a corbelled roof and a later passage leading into it. There is also a small recess within the chamber.
Its position within a substantial settlement of houses, boundaries and agricultural infrastructure suggests that it should be considered as part of the wider organisation of the community rather than as an isolated underground monument.

Boleigh and Halliggye provide similar associations between fogous and enclosed settlements with substantial boundary works, while Pendeen Vau demonstrates the deliberate control of movement through its subterranean passage and between the underground structure and the surface. Taken together, these examples show that fogous were carefully planned and integrated into their settlements. Concealment, restricted access and the protection of people or possessions may all have been important, but so too may storage, refuge, ritual or other specialised functions.

The narrow ‘creeps’ found in some fogous are particularly intriguing. Their restricted dimensions would make them unsuitable for moving large quantities of goods or for normal domestic movement, particularly with livestock. They could have controlled access to the underground space and made it difficult for an outsider to enter. Nevertheless, there is no compelling evidence that these passages were specifically designed as defensive choke points. Their unusual form could equally have had practical, symbolic or ritual significance.

We know very little about Iron Age British beliefs. Much of the written evidence we have comes from Roman authors who, let’s be honest, had their own reasons for portraying the peoples they encountered as savage or barbaric. Those accounts need to be treated with some caution and understood within that context.
For that reason, a ritual interpretation of fogous is worth taking seriously. The underground environment was fundamentally different from ordinary domestic space. Darkness, restricted access, carefully constructed stonework and separation from the surface could have created an unusual and otherworldly environment.

At Carn Euny, the more elaborate subterranean chamber is particularly difficult to explain in purely practical or military terms. Some fogous may have had symbolic or ritual functions involving particular individuals, objects or ceremonies. If so, their association with settlement boundaries may have been social or symbolic.

The possibility of multiple functions may ultimately be the best approach. It is unlikely that every fogou was constructed for exactly the same purpose. Their forms differ, their settlement contexts differ, and some appear to have been modified over time.

What is perhaps most interesting is what this tells us about the communities themselves. The construction of these underground spaces required planning, labour and social organisation. Their presence within or alongside settlements also suggests that the people who built them were thinking carefully about how space was organised and used. This does not point towards a society constantly living in fear of war. It may simply suggest that storing food, tools and other valuable possessions were normal concerns of everyday life, just as they are today.

The wider evidence from the Penwith landscape would seem to support that interpretation. Iron Age West Cornwall was not simply a collection of isolated farms. Settlements were organised within boundaries and formed part of a wider social and political landscape. Communities had the time, manpower and resources to invest in substantial architecture. My own reading of the evidence points more towards a landscape of connected local communities, rather than one of fractured, constantly competing settlements. Raiding, livestock theft, feuds and small-scale violence may well have taken place, but large-scale conflict remains much harder to show.

Fogous cannot resolve the question on their own, but they add an intriguing dimension to the picture. They show that Iron Age communities in western Cornwall were prepared to create substantial spaces that were deliberately concealed from the surface and, in some cases, difficult to access. Whether that was about protection, storage, refuge, ritual or some combination of these remains unknown.

Ultimately, the fogous remain enigmatic because their builders left no written explanation of their purpose. Perhaps that ambiguity is precisely what makes them so intriguing. Rather than providing a simple answer, they raise far more questions about the people who built them, what they valued, what they feared and how they understood the world around them.

Image created with AI.

Two Hills of PenwithThere are several prominent hills around the St Ives area. These include Worvas, more commonly known...
03/09/2026

Two Hills of Penwith
There are several prominent hills around the St Ives area. These include Worvas, more commonly known as The Steeple, Rosewall, Trevalgan, Trink and Trencrom. Today, we're going to focus on just two.
Trencrom and Trink stand close together between Lelant and Nancledra, but they each have a very different character. Both are part of the Penwith outcrop of the Cornubian Batholith, the vast granite intrusion that forms the geological foundation of Cornwall and much of Devon.
Trencrom is dominated by its dramatic summit and substantial prehistoric enclosure, while nearby Trink is broader and higher, with a Bronze Age round barrow and a standing stone. Both hills have distinctive granite outcrops and evidence of 18th and 19th-century mining. As prominent landmarks in the eastern Penwith landscape, Trencrom and Trink preserve evidence of human activity stretching back thousands of years, from prehistoric monuments and later settlement to industrial activity, alongside granite features that have become part of local folklore.
At Trencrom, large granite outcrops, or tors, occur around the summit that were incorporated into a prehistoric enclosure. The rampart closely follows the contours of the summit. Trencrom rises to around 175 metres above sea level. Its position and steep eastern flank make it highly conspicuous and easy to recognise, particularly when travelling from the east into Penwith.
The summit gives some fantastic views across the surrounding countryside. Looking north, you can see St Ives Bay. To the south are St Michael's Mount and the wide sweep of Mount's Bay. The Hayle Estuary and central Cornwall stretch away to the east, while the granite hills of Penwith continue westwards. Its position, as the first prominent hill encountered when approaching Penwith from the east, clearly made Trencrom an important landmark. Whether the enclosure was intended to make a claim over the surrounding landscape, however, is hard to say.
Human activity at Trencrom began long before the prehistoric enclosure was built. Mesolithic flint artefacts have been found on the hill, including several microliths, while Neolithic finds include numerous worked flints and stone axes. The summit enclosure is generally considered to be Neolithic in origin, dating to around 3700 to 3500 BC. It covers just under a hectare and is surrounded by a substantial stone and earth rampart, which incorporates the tors. The entrances on the eastern and western sides are marked by large granite monoliths and approached by hollow ways.
The original purpose of the enclosure is uncertain. It has sometimes been described as a Neolithic hillfort, although that can give the misleading impression that it was simply a defensive structure. The enclosure may have had several purposes, including settlement, ritual activity, social organisation or the marking of territory. We simply can't know for certain what people intended when they built it. What is clear is that the construction of the enclosure gave an already prominent hill an impressive human monument.
Trink stands next door to Trencrom, but couldn’t be any more different from its neighbour. At approximately 212 metres, it is considerably higher than Trencrom, with a broad and rounded summit rather than a narrow, rocky one. A prehistoric round barrow occupies the summit of Trink, dating roughly from the Bronze Age. It was constructed from earth and stone over a burial. The barrow has become ruined over time, possibly due to weather, or perhaps because of human and animal activity. During the 20th century, an Ordnance Survey trig point, TP6586, was built within the ruins.
A second prehistoric monument survives on the western slope, a standing stone near the former Giew Mine. The original date and purpose of this stone are uncertain. It is sometimes described as a prehistoric menhir, but there isn't enough evidence to be certain when it was erected. It may belong to the Neolithic or Bronze Age, although this remains a possibility rather than an established fact.
It would be safe to assume that the barrow and standing stone are not contemporary, but this is not certain. If the standing stone is indeed prehistoric and predates the barrow, it may be the reason the barrow builders chose Trink as the place to lay their dead to rest. The presence of these monuments, together with the hill's prominent position, suggests that Trink was an important place within the prehistoric Penwith landscape.
Trencrom's enclosure was reoccupied during the Iron Age. However, that suggests that it may have been abandoned and possibly forgotten in the interim, which cannot be proved. The site may have continued to be a place of significance for the local population during this time. What we can say is that it was repurposed and modified. Evidence for this includes pottery and roundhouse platforms. Its elevated position would have offered protection and extensive views. However, it shouldn't be approached in the traditional Victorian archaeological way and simply assumed to be a military fortress. Iron Age hillforts, like their predecessors, could have served as settlements, gathering places or centres of authority and ritual, as well as expressing a territorial claim.
The two hills represent different forms of prehistoric activity. Trencrom developed as an enclosed hilltop site, involving settlement or ritual activities, while Trink became a place of burial, marked by its round barrow.
The granite landscape of both hills eventually became part of the folklore of West Cornwall.
Trencrom was traditionally associated with a giant named Trecobben. Legend tells of Trecobben and Cormoran, two giants who played games across the landscape by throwing stones between Trencrom and St Michael's Mount. The stories tell us that Trecobben accidentally killed Cormoran's wife, Cormelian, with a thrown hammer. The giant is also linked with the great stones and tors around the hill, particularly Bowl Rock, which sits in the valley below Trencrom beside the road between Trevethoe and Balnoon.
Trink developed with its own traditions. The hill became locally famous for the Twelve O'Clock Rock. Tradition centred on this granite formation, which is situated on the south-eastern side of the hill the rock was regarded by locals local as a type of logan stone, a rock that can be made to move or rock. However, this particular one was believed to move only at midnight.
Nineteenth-century accounts describe the tradition as being particularly associated with children suffering from rickets. People would bring their sick children to the stone and place them upon it at midnight. It was believed that if the stone moved, the treatment had been successful. The rock was also said to respond to sounds such as a c**k crowing or church bells. These accounts don't establish how old the practice was. They do, however, give us an unusually detailed glimpse into local belief and show how people later interpreted and understood the landscape around them.
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries brought a very different use of the two hills.
The area around the hills, like much of Penwith, is rich in mineral resources. At Trink, these were worked through Giew Mine, which introduced shafts, pits, tracks and spoil into a landscape that was already rich with prehistoric monuments. On Trencrom, mining took place around the summit and slopes through workings including Wheal Cherry. In 1875, several workings on the two hills were brought together under Wheal Sister, a consolidation of earlier mining ventures.
Granite quarrying also changed parts of the hills, damaging or removing some natural features that had significance in local tradition. At Trencrom, later quarrying and stone splitting are recorded within the wider area of the monument.
The human histories of both hills stretch back thousands of years, with evidence of prehistoric activity, later settlement, mining and local folklore. Archaeology and monuments can tell us how people used the landscape, although they cannot tell us how those people understood it. The mining remains show how the hills were later exploited for their mineral resources, while the stories of giants and the Twelve O'Clock Rock reflect a later layer of local tradition.
Taken together, Trencrom and Trink contain a wide range of evidence from different periods, bringing together prehistoric monuments, geology, Iron Age occupation, industrial-era mining and local folklore within a relatively small area of the Penwith landscape.

Photo: view from summit of Trencrom with the sun setting behind Trink

02/09/2026

IMPORTANT BIATHLON UPDATE!!!

We have decided to pull the races forward by 30 minutes to allow extra time in the water for the RNLI and water safety crews due to shorter daylight hours.

🌊The Junior and Novice events will now start at 6:00pm.
🌊The main race will now start at 6:30pm.
(Saturday 12th September 2026)

Please help spread the word.

Cornish Place Names: The Landscape Through Language.Cornish place names provide a remarkable record of Cornwall and the ...
28/08/2026

Cornish Place Names: The Landscape Through Language.
Cornish place names provide a remarkable record of Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, preserving clues about the landscape, history and people who lived here. Far more than simple labels on a map, many began as descriptions of the land, the people who lived there, the work they carried out, or the religious traditions associated with particular places. For anyone interested in Cornwall's history, place names offer a fascinating way of looking at the landscape through the language of the people who knew it best. They preserve a glimpse of landscapes that may have changed. That is part of what makes them so interesting. The landscape described by a name may have altered dramatically, while the name itself has survived for centuries. Along the way, Cornish names were written down by English speakers and were often reshaped to fit English pronunciation and spelling. Some have fairly straightforward explanations, while others have several possible meanings, and some remain uncertain. The examples that follow explore some of the Cornish words used to describe the places around them, and how those words can still offer glimpses of the Cornwall in which they were first used.
The names Cornwall and Kernow have a long and closely connected history. Kernow, the Cornish name for Cornwall, is old and is generally connected with the ancient tribal name Cornovii. The name is traditionally linked with a Celtic word meaning horn, possibly referring to the projecting shape of the Cornish peninsula. This is a long-standing interpretation, but the precise origin remains debated. Cornwall, meanwhile, developed from the same ancient name combined with the Old English wealas, a word used by the Anglo-Saxons for Brittonic people. It is related to the word from which Welsh developed. Kernow and Cornwall are consequently two different linguistic developments connected to the ancient name of the region and its people, rather than unrelated names. If the traditional horn interpretation is correct, it may even preserve an early Brittonic description of Cornwall's distinctive projecting shape.
The Cornish element penn means head, end or top and appears in a huge number of place names, particularly those describing prominent points of land or elevated places. Dinas refers to a fortified place or hillfort, while enys means island and can also suggest an isolated place. At Falmouth, Pendennis comes from the Cornish Penn Dinas, giving the sense of a prominent point associated with a fortification. The name is older than Pendennis Castle itself, so it should not be assumed to refer specifically to the castle. Instead, it preserves an earlier association between the headland and a fortified place. The same combination appears at Pendinas (the Island) in St Ives, again bringing together penn, a prominent point, and dinas, a fort or fortified place. At the southern end of St Mary's in the Isles of Scilly, Peninnis Head is associated with Penn Enys, approximately head or end of the island. Here, penn is combined with enys, island or isolated place. Penwith, meanwhile, has the Cornish form Pennwydh. Its traditional interpretation is headland at the end, which is fitting given its position at the far western end of Cornwall. The precise history of the second element is more complicated than a simple word for end, however, and the meaning should not be treated as completely settled. Together, these names show how penn could be combined with different elements to describe prominent places according to their position, character or association with other features.
Innisidgen on St Mary's in the Isles of Scilly provides another intriguing example of how Cornish place names can preserve descriptions of the landscape. The name is traditionally interpreted as meaning ox island, from the Cornish enys or inis, meaning island or isolated place, together with ojyon the Cornish for ox. Older Cornish-name sources record forms such as Insidgen and give the interpretation ox isle. The name is particularly interesting because Innisidgen refers not only to the prehistoric site and hill on St Mary's but also to a small tidal island just offshore. Nor does the name necessarily mean that the area was once surrounded by water, as enys could also refer to an isolated or distinct piece of land. Like so many Cornish names, it offers a small glimpse into a landscape that may have been understood rather differently when the name first came into use.
Some Cornish names create a surprisingly vivid picture. Karrek Loos yn Koos, the Cornish name for St Michael's Mount, is traditionally translated as grey rock in the woodland. Karrek means rock, loos means grey, y'n means in the and koos refers to woodland. It is a wonderfully evocative name, especially when we remember that the landscape around Mount's Bay has changed considerably over time. Submerged peat and woodland remains have been recorded around the bay, providing evidence of former landscapes now beneath the sea. The name itself cannot tell us exactly when woodland stood around the Mount. It does, however, preserve a striking association between the rock and woodland, bringing together language, landscape change and local memory.
The element porth can mean cove or harbour. Depending on the place, a porth might describe a harbour, landing place or small coastal inlet. Porth Ia, the Cornish name for St Ives, combines porth with Ia, the saint traditionally associated with the town. The modern Cornish form is Porthia, giving the approximate sense of Ia's harbour or Ia's cove. Mousehole provides another example. Its Cornish name, Porthenys, combines porth with enys, island or isolated place. The name is associated with the small rocky islet of St Clement's Isle offshore. The widespread use of porth reflects something fundamental about life in Cornwall: the meeting point between land and sea mattered enormously, whether it was a major harbour or a much smaller cove where people landed boats.
Porthcurno is a good example of why it is worth looking beyond modern English spellings when interpreting Cornish names. Its Cornish form, Porthkornow, combines porth with kornow, meaning horns or corners. The name is therefore traditionally understood in the sense of cove of horns or cove of corners. The name suits a landscape of projecting rocks and cliffs, although it is wise not to assume that a modern landscape feature must be exactly what the original name described. Historical spellings also show how Cornish names changed as they were written down using English spelling conventions. Over time, the original form became less obvious, leaving us with the much more familiar Porthcurno. It is a good reminder that a place name can contain a vivid little description of the landscape, even when centuries of spelling changes have hidden it from view.
The Cornish landscape is particularly rich in names describing stone and rock. Karrek means rock, while karn refers to a crag, tor or cairn. Both are especially appropriate in Cornwall, where granite outcrops and rocky uplands are such familiar features. Carn Brea, for example, preserves carn in its name and reflects the rocky prominence rising above the surrounding landscape. Such names show just how visual Cornish place naming could be. A distinctive rock, tor or crag could become the feature by which an entire locality was recognised.
Brown W***y demonstrates why place name meanings should sometimes be handled with a little caution. Its Cornish form is Bronn Wenneli, traditionally interpreted as hill of swallows. Bronn refers to a breast-shaped or rounded hill, while gwenneli means swallows. There is also an alternative interpretation connecting the name with the idea of the highest hill. That is particularly tempting because Brown W***y, at 420 metres, is the highest point in Cornwall. Hill of swallows remains the established traditional interpretation, but the competing explanation is a useful reminder that a meaning can fit a landscape beautifully without necessarily being the original meaning. And, of course, Brown W***y is itself a wonderfully memorable English version of a much older Cornish name.
Cornish place names can describe rivers and crossings as well as hills and headlands. Res means ford, while rudh means red. The Cornish form of Redruth is Resrudh, giving the straightforward sense of red ford. It is tempting to connect the colour with the mining landscape and the reddish material found in the area, but there is no need to assume that modern mining was responsible for the original name. The safer interpretation is simply that Resrudh preserves an association with a ford. That is still a useful glimpse into how ordinary features, such as a crossing point and the colour of the surrounding landscape, could become part of a place's identity.
Some Cornish names describe where a place is rather than what it looks like. Aber is associated with the mouth of a river, while Fal is the name of the river itself. Falmouth is a relatively young town by Cornish standards, having been established as a planned settlement in the early 17th century. The area itself, however, was much older, with the estate of Arwenack and the harbour already forming part of the landscape. The modern name Falmouth is an English name, combining the name of the River Fal with mouth, describing its position at the river's estuary. The Cornish form Aberfala, meaning roughly mouth of the Fal, provides an interesting parallel, although it is a modern Cornish form rather than evidence that the newly founded town was historically known by that name. Falmouth therefore offers a useful glimpse of Cornwall at a time when English was increasingly replacing Cornish in everyday use.
Truro is a good example of why a popular explanation is not always the same thing as a secure etymology. The city's Cornish form is Truru, but its meaning is uncertain. The familiar explanation that Truro means three rivers is attractive because of the city's position within the Fal estuarine system, where the Kenwyn and Allen meet the Truro River. But geographical suitability alone does not prove that this was the original meaning. It is therefore better to present three rivers as a traditional interpretation rather than an established fact. In some ways, the uncertainty makes the name more interesting, because it reminds us how much detective work is involved in understanding very old place names.
The upland landscape also appears in Cornish names referring to vegetation. Goon means downs or open upland, while prenn means timber. The Cornish form of Bodmin Moor, Goon Brenn, is therefore commonly understood in the sense of downs of timber or wooded downs. That makes for an intriguing contrast with the open, largely treeless landscape we see today. It does not mean that the whole of Bodmin Moor was once covered in forest. A place name may refer to a particular feature or part of a much wider landscape. What it does remind us is that the moor has a long environmental history, and today's landscape is only one chapter of it.
Cornish place names were not limited to dramatic landmarks. Nans means valley, while pol means pool, providing simple descriptions of smaller features of the countryside. Names containing nans can point to valleys and low-lying areas, while pol can identify pools or small bodies of water. These names can be especially useful where modern settlement has grown around or obscured the original feature. Valleys, pools, streams, slopes and other everyday features could all be important enough to become part of the local map.
River names are among the most interesting pieces of a landscape's vocabulary because they can survive long after the languages that created them have changed. Cornwall provides several good examples. The Hayle derives from the Cornish Heyl, meaning estuary. The Camel has the Cornish form Kammel, and the name is generally associated with a word meaning crooked, an appropriate description for a winding river. The Gannel provides another simple example. Its Cornish form is An Ganel, with kanel meaning channel. The Helford is more complicated than it might first appear. The older history of the complete name is uncertain, so it is better not to force it into a neat translation
The Stennack in St Ives provides another good example of a place name reflecting the area's working landscape. The Cornish form is Stenek, associated with sten, meaning tin, and the name is traditionally understood as referring to a place of tin or tin-bearing ground. The Stennack valley was home to several mines, and the name survives today in the road, river and area known as the Stennack.
Other rivers take us into even older and less certain linguistic territory. The Fowey has the Cornish forms Fowi for the river and Fowydh for the settlement. The history of the river name reaches further back and is not as straightforward as some of the simpler Cornish examples. The Fal, known in Cornish as Dowr Fala, combines dowr, meaning water or river, with the older river name Fala. The meaning of Fala itself is uncertain. The Tamar is older still, with the name recorded in antiquity. Its precise meaning remains uncertain, but its survival through different linguistic periods shows just how long river names can endure. Taken together, these waterways reveal several layers of Cornwall's linguistic history. Some names still contain recognisable Cornish descriptions of the landscape, while others reach back into much older periods whose languages and meanings are now only partly understood.
The element tre gives us a glimpse of the human landscape. Meaning farmstead or settlement, it occurs in a huge number of Cornish place names and reflects the importance of farms and settlements in Cornwall's history. A name containing tre may identify a particular farmstead or settlement and can be followed by a personal name, a landscape feature or another distinguishing element. These names are valuable because they help us understand how people occupied and organised the countryside. They are, in effect, small pieces of evidence about where people lived and how they described the places around them.
Cornish place names also preserve a rich religious landscape. The element lann originally meant enclosure but became particularly associated with religious foundations and sacred places. This reflects the development of early Christian communities, when an enclosed place could also become a centre of worship or religious activity. Names containing lann therefore give us clues about places where enclosure, settlement and Christianity became closely connected. They also remind us that the Cornish landscape was not simply a collection of farms and natural features. It was a landscape shaped by belief as well as by work and geography.
Penzance provides a particularly clear example of physical and religious meaning being brought together. Its Cornish form, Pennsans, combines penn, meaning head or end, with sans, meaning holy. It can therefore be understood as holy head. The first element describes the physical feature, while the second gives it a religious character. Penzance shows how a place could be described both by what it was and by what it meant to the people who used it. A headland could be a physical landmark while also carrying religious associations.
Lelant provides an interesting example of a place name preserving both a physical description and the memory of an individual. Its Cornish form, Lannanta, combines lann, enclosure, with Anta, a personal name, giving the approximate sense Anta's enclosure. Historical forms include Lananta and several later variations. The association with St Anta survives in the name, although the details of her life remain uncertain. Local tradition connects St Anta with St Ia of St Ives, sometimes describing them as sisters, but such traditions should be kept separate from what can be established historically. Lelant also shows how much place names can change over time. Historical forms such as Lananta eventually developed into the English Lelant, while Lannanta represents the modern Cornish form. The different versions are therefore not simply alternative spellings of the same unchanged name. They are evidence of a long history of linguistic change.
The great attraction of Cornish place names is that they can seem to offer direct statements about the past. The temptation is to look at a name and think we have solved the mystery. But place names are clues, not archaeological reports. A name containing dinas may point towards a fortified place, but it cannot tell us when the fort was built or how it was used. A reference to woodland does not tell us exactly when the trees disappeared. A name describing a feature may even have been transferred to a nearby settlement as the landscape and settlement patterns changed. Saints' names present similar difficulties. They can preserve religious associations without necessarily giving us reliable information about the person behind the name.
The history of spelling matters too. Cornish names were sometimes translated, partly translated or reshaped under the influence of English pronunciation and spelling. Modern Cornish forms should therefore be understood as modern representations based on historical evidence, rather than automatically treated as unchanged Early or Middle Cornish spellings. This is why place names work best when they are considered alongside archaeology, historical documents, geology, old maps and the landscape itself.
Cornish place names can ultimately be thought of as a kind of linguistic map of Cornwall. Perhaps this is what makes Cornish place names so compelling. They are not simple translations. They contain fragments of observations made by generations of people who lived in, travelled through and worked across the landscape. The coastline, rivers, hills, valleys and settlements were named according to how they were experienced and understood, sometimes in physical terms, sometimes through practical uses, and sometimes through religious or personal associations. The landscape has changed. Woodland has come and gone, rivers and valleys have been altered by human activity, settlements have grown, and ancient fortifications have fallen into ruin. Yet the names remain. They are surviving pieces of the Cornish language, embedded in the landscape itself. They allow the modern map to become something more. Look closely enough, and it becomes a record of how the Cornish saw and understood their land.

Address

The Guildhall, Street-an-Pol
Saint Ives
TR262DS

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 1pm
2pm - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 1pm
2pm - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 1pm
2pm - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 1pm
2pm - 5pm
Friday 9am - 1pm
2pm - 5pm
Saturday 9am - 11am
3pm - 5pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Cornish Riviera Holidays posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Cornish Riviera Holidays:

Shortcuts

Share

Category